Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.
The world has seen an incredible amount of advancement in the field of technology over the last few decades. With more and more people gaining access to the internet, there are many ways that tech has grown and empowered all facets of human society and people have the ability to stay in touch with each other like never before. The globe itself is becoming more integrated than it ever has been and this has led to incredible advancements in everything from medical technologies to completely transforming the world of business and commerce.
While there have been so many incredible ways that technology has allowed for advancement, it has also come with its challenges. Everything from learning how to store and use data, to integrating new and emerging technology constantly comes with a certain amount of challenges that companies are faced. One aspect of the challenge is simply capacity.
The digital world is an incredible one, but it’s also one that can take a substantial amount of monitoring and work. This can mean that businesses can quickly find themselves in a place where they either lack the talent on their teams to complete certain tasks, or they simply don’t have enough of it. Data engineers and scientists, coders, and tech specialists are becoming more and more important to the modern landscape of business and commerce. However, there are times when processes are too demanding.
The challenge comes in constantly leveraging your team’s time for success. This means finding tools that can help to create that leverage, and offload tedious, time-intensive work. One such type of tool is known as orchestration. Orchestration tools help to give teams the ability to leverage their time by being able to schedule and maintain certain functions and events without having to individually monitor them. This allows a team to have freedom from heavy workloads so they can spend their time focusing on areas of higher impact.
When it comes to app development are containers. These are some of the most effective orchestration tools for teams to use that leverage time in effective and meaningful ways. Two of the most popular containers on the market are ECS and Kubernetes. If you have been wondering what the biggest differences are when it comes to ECS vs Kubernetes, here is everything you need to know.
What is ECS?
ECS is Amazon’s own container service and stands for Elastic Container Service. This is a fully-realized container service that can offer some great advantages to teams that are working with AWS services. Some of the best perks of using Amazon’s ECS are that it has an easy learning curve that integrates with AWS services seamlessly, has accelerated development, as well as high performance, and scalability out of the box.
This is by no means a tool that cannot perform well for any team looking to orchestrate app-related workloads. The concept of a container as a tool is something that has become necessary, as maintenance on apps otherwise would become too intensive.
What is Kubernetes?
Kubernetes is an orchestration tool that has consistently been ranked as one of the most loved containers among software developers. As an open-source container, Kubernetes brings a lot of advantages to teams looking to automate software deployment, scaling, and management. Kubernetes offers great integration with AWS services. One advantage to using Kubernetes with AWS services is that you can use Amazon EKS, which stands for Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service.
Biggest Differences Between Amazon EKS and ECS?
Both ECS and EKS both work seamlessly with AWS services and can be a huge advantage as a solid orchestration tool for any development team. The EKS has a major advantage over ECS in that it allows teams to use the open-source aspect of Kubernetes to empower software teams to work with other practitioners who are also within the Kubernetes ecosystem. Kubernetes is one of the largest container platforms on the market, so there are naturally going to be a variety of rich opportunities to work with other teams sharing the same platform.
The advantage of working with Amazon ECS is that there is a much easier learning curve to master. This can help your teams to understand and deploy containers more seamlessly, however, the complexity of EKS can be minimized by EKS’s extensible platform. The native interactions that software developers have with the Kubernetes API server do open doors to help with custom resource definitions.
Conclusion
When it comes to pricing, ECS uses a modeled scale that equates costs correlated to usage. The more you use ECS, the more it will cost. EKS will cost teams $0.10 per Amazon EKS cluster that is created. Both services offer solid orchestration for teams. ECS has the advantage of being more user-friendly and integrating with AWS seamlessly, while EKS shares the same benefits, but is more complicated, with access to the Kubernetes API server which could prove useful.
